Blog

  • First Steps’ Replaced the Thing On-Set With a Rock Named Jennifer

    First Steps’ Replaced the Thing On-Set With a Rock Named Jennifer

    Marvel Studios films are known to use unconventional methods for their character stand-ins and The Fantastic Four: First Steps aims to top the methods that came before. Actor Sean Gunn acted as a stand-in for Bradley Cooper as Guardians of the Galaxy’s Rocket Raccoon throughout various productions, but in a fun turn of events for the Matt Shakman-helmed feature, star Ebon Moss-Bachrach, who plays superhero Ben Grimm, got a different sort of companion to help bring the Thing to life.

    Pulling a lot of the weight was “Jennifer”: a rock.

    “We went out to the desert and found a rock that looked exactly how we thought the Thing should look,” Shakman told Empire Magazine, “and we filmed it in every single shot that the Thing appears in in the movie, under every lighting environment.”

    The practical stand-in—no insight was given into the name choice, in case you’re also wondering about that—helped CG animators with the reference needed for coloring and lighting that would be required to support Moss-Bachrach’s motion-capture performance. It also helped ensure the character’s final form on screen wouldn’t be too cartoony.

    Moss-Bachrach told the magazine, “It’s a little bit heady to think about all the hundreds of people that are helping animate this character. I just had faith that they would make my performance so much cooler. I’m very, very happy with the way Ben looks.”

    While Jennifer helped with the character’s craggy appearance, the actor also did a deeper dive into Grimm’s interior too. “He’s a Lower East Side guy,” the actor explained about his connection as a NY native, same as the character’s creator Jack Kirby, who he kept in mind while creating his take on Ben. “A lot of this character was a homage to his father, and that, to me, is very meaningful.”

    The Fantastic Four: First Steps opens in theaters July 25.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

  • Artificial selection — when humans take what they want genetically

    Artificial selection — when humans take what they want genetically

    Long before DNA unraveled the double helix of life, scientists were already tinkering with its inheritance. The idea that traits could be passed from one generation to the next fascinated early naturalists. So, they began testing it the only way they could — by breeding plants and animals, watching what happened, and doing it again. This ancient curiosity gave rise to a powerful tool: artificial selection.

    Also known as selective breeding, artificial selection is the human-guided cousin of evolution by natural selection. Instead of letting nature decide who reproduces, we do. Whether cultivating corn with plumper kernels or breeding dogs with specific skills, we nudge life’s genetic trajectory to suit our own ends.

    Through generations of careful choice — favoring this cow over that one, this tomato over that vine — we’ve shaped everything from the foods we eat to the companions we cherish. The results are often striking. A Chihuahua and a Great Dane share a common wolf ancestor, yet selective breeding has pulled them worlds apart in form and function.

    It was this human-driven tinkering with traits — selecting the fastest horse, the sweetest fruit, the most obedient dog — that gave Charles Darwin a crucial clue. If humans could mold species over generations, could nature be doing something similar, only on a much grander scale?

    Natural selection versus artificial selection

    On The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin emphasized how natural selection is a force that drives evolution. Image credits: Wikicommons

    Natural selection, a fundamental pillar of evolutionary theory, is a process through which populations of organisms undergo adaptation and transformation. In essence, this process favors individuals endowed with advantageous traits for survival and reproduction, ensuring their greater likelihood of passing on genes to successive generations. This concept is succinctly encapsulated as the “survival of the fittest”. Unlike artificial selection, this is a natural process wherein the environment exerts selective pressure on the organisms leading to speciation. 

    Darwin drew parallels between natural selection and artificial selection. He was inspired by the evolution observed in pigeons bred as a hobby in England. Due to this inspiration, he recognized that the principles underlying artificial selection could be applied to explain the process of natural evolution. In both cases, the differences in survival and reproduction success of individuals based on their traits led to changes in populations over time, driving evolution.

    Darwin’s appreciation of selective breeding served as a bridge between human-driven interventions and natural phenomena. 

    The Origins of a Theory

    It’s hard to overstate how much Charles Darwin leaned on artificial selection to shape his theory of natural selection. In his legendary book, On the Origin of Species, Darwin drew a compelling analogy between the pigeon breeders of Victorian England and nature itself. Just as a breeder might favor birds with fancier tails, nature, through environmental pressures, favors traits that offer an edge in survival or reproduction.

    Take the finches of the Galápagos Islands — a classic tale. Though Darwin didn’t obsess over them as deeply as later textbooks suggest, their diverse beak shapes became an enduring metaphor for his big idea. Each beak, tuned to crack a specific seed or sip from a certain flower, hinted at nature’s quiet sculpting over time.

    These variations were not arbitrary but more so finely tuned adaptations to the available food sources in the environment. Darwin recognized that beak morphology affected the finches’ ability to survive and thrive in their respective habitats and thus, the concept of natural selection was born. 

    Illustration of Galapagos finches
    The famous illustration of Darwin’s finches highlights variations in beak structure among finches that have diverse diets and live in distinct habitats. Photo by John Gould/ Wikicommons.

    However, Darwin didn’t have the last word on evolution. In fact, evolution is still a very active field of research, and new (surprising) findings are still coming in.

    Natural Selection Could Slow Evolution

    But here’s where things get more interesting. In a 2023 study published in New Phytologist, researchers from Michigan State University led by Jeff Conner proposed a twist: natural selection doesn’t always accelerate evolution. Sometimes, it slows it down.

    “We’re suggesting that selection can also slow things down, that it can cause similarities as well as differences,” said Conner in his interview with the US National Science Foundation. 

    “Perhaps the best method to test for short-term constraints is artificial selection because if a trait responds to artificial selection, it clearly can evolve,” the team added. “But if the trait does not respond, there is a constraint caused by a lack of genetic variation.”

    The team studied the length of the stamens or pollen-producing parts of wild radish, wherein two of its six stamens are short while the remaining four are long. Interestingly, this trait was found to be widespread among nearly 4,000 relatives of the wild radish.

    To investigate the influence of selection, they employed artificial selection, selectively breeding wild radishes with stamens closer in length, aiming to alter this characteristic. The results were remarkable and not only did the trait respond to selection, but the team also managed to narrow down the difference in stamen length by over 30%. 

    Researchers believe that the differences in stamen length gives the species an advantage when it comes to pollination syndromes, but they aren’t sure exactly what that advantage is. Nonetheless, this study demonstrates that selection can also slow evolution and maintain similarities throughout generations. 

    Humans Are Genetic Tinkerers

    The power of artificial selection is most evident in agriculture. Thousands of years ago, humans began selectively breeding a wild mustard plant, Brassica oleracea. The result? Broccoli, cabbage, kale, cauliflower, and kohlrabi — all from the same ancestral weed. By focusing on traits like leafiness, flower sterility, or stem swelling, farmers sculpted entirely new vegetables.

    Artificial selection in plants aims to seek enhanced traits such as yield, pest resistance, nutritional content, and adaptability to changing environmental conditions. Selective breeders utilize techniques such as crossbreeding, hybridization, and genetic engineering. 

    One of the most popular examples is the selective breeding of wild mustard which resulted in five distinct staple vegetables like cauliflower, broccoli, cabbage, kale, and kohlrabi. All these greens bear little to no resemblance with the wild mustard, Brassica oleracea. For example, the emergence of kale resulted from the preference and selection of mustard plants with larger leaves. Cauliflower, on the other hand, was cultivated through the selection for sterile flowers, while cabbage was developed by choosing plants with a specific internode length, leading to a shorter distance between leaves.

    Selective breeding of wild mustard led to five distinct crops. Photo credits: Pat Holroyd (for the wild mustard) and Helina Chin (for the cauliflower, broccoli, cabbage, kohlrabi, and kale)

    In animals, the process is just as transformative. Domesticated dogs exploded in variety thanks to selective breeding for size, behavior, and looks. Herding breeds like the Border Collie are tuned for agility and intelligence. Meanwhile, guard dogs like the Dogo Argentino were bred for strength and loyalty.

    Two dogs showing the large size variation due to artificial selection
    Variation in the sizes and body features of dogs like Great Danes and Chihuahuas is a result of selective breeding and domestication. Image credis: Ellen Levy Finch/Wikicommons.

    Other artificial selection examples

    • Wheat varieties with disease resistance, higher yields, and desirable baking qualities
    • Corn varieties that have improved kernel size, sweetness, and resistance to pests.
    • Roses were selected for traits such as color, fragrance, and petal arrangement. 
    • Cattles have been selectively bred aimed at improving meat and milk production. Different breeds like Angus for beef and Holstein for milk were a result of artificial selection. 
    • Horses were also selectively bred to be tailored for specific tasks. For instance, Thoroughbreds were selected for horse racing and other equestrian sports.
    Corn varieties formed through artificial selection

    Corn varieties as a result of artificial selection. Image credits: LoggaWiggler/Pixabay.

    Artificial selection may lack the grandeur of glaciers or the violence of extinction, but it’s no less a force of evolution. It’s a quiet, methodical kind of power — one rooted in gardens, barns, and laboratories. As we continue to shape life, we should remember that evolution isn’t just something that happens to us. It’s something we do.

  • Your Morning Coffee Might Be Sabotaging Your Meds — Here’s What You Need to Know

    Your Morning Coffee Might Be Sabotaging Your Meds — Here’s What You Need to Know

    For many of us, the day doesn’t start until we’ve had our first cup of coffee. It’s comforting, energising, and one of the most widely consumed beverages in the world. But while your morning brew might feel harmless, it can interact with certain medicines in ways that reduce their effectiveness – or increase the risk of side-effects.

    From common cold tablets to antidepressants, caffeine’s impact on the body goes far beyond a quick energy boost. Tea also contains caffeine but not in the same concentrations as coffee, and doesn’t seem to affect people in the same way. Here’s what you should know about how coffee can interfere with your medications – and how to stay safe.

    1. Cold and flu medicines

    Caffeine is a stimulant, which means it speeds up the central nervous system. Pseudoephedrine, a decongestant found in cold and flu remedies such as Sudafed, is also a stimulant. When taken together, the effects can be amplified – potentially leading to jitters or restlessness, headaches, fast heart rate and insomnia.

    Many cold medications already contain added caffeine, increasing these risks further. Some studies also suggest that combining caffeine with pseudoephedrine can raise blood sugar and body temperature – particularly important for people with diabetes.

    Stimulant effects are also a concern when combining caffeine with ADHD medications such as amphetamines, or with asthma drugs such as theophylline, which shares a similar chemical structure to caffeine. Using them together may increase the risk of side-effects such as a rapid heartbeat and sleep disruption.

    2. Thyroid medication

    Levothyroxine, the standard treatment for an underactive thyroid, is highly sensitive to timing – and your morning coffee can get in the way. Studies show that drinking coffee too soon after taking levothyroxine can reduce its absorption by up to 50%.

    Caffeine speeds up gut motility (the movement of food and waste through the digestive tract), giving the drug less time to be absorbed – and may also bind to it in the stomach, making it harder for the body to take in. These effects reduce the drug’s bioavailability, meaning less of it reaches your bloodstream where it’s needed. This interaction is more common with tablet forms of levothyroxine, and less likely with liquid formulations.

    If absorption is impaired, symptoms of hypothyroidism – including fatigue, weight gain and constipation – can return, even if you’re taking your medicine correctly.

    The same timing rule applies to a class of osteoporosis medications called bisphosphonates, including alendronate and risedronate, which also require an empty stomach and around 30-60 minutes before food or drink is taken.

    3. Antidepressants and antipsychotics

    The interaction between caffeine and mental health medications can be more complex.

    Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as sertraline and citalopram, are a type of antidepressant medication widely used to treat depression, anxiety and other psychiatric conditions. Lab studies suggest caffeine can bind to these drugs in the stomach, reducing absorption and potentially making them less effective.

    Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), such as amitriptyline and imipramine, are a class of older antidepressants that work by affecting the levels of neurotransmitters in the brain. They were among the first antidepressants developed and are less commonly used today, compared with newer antidepressants such as SSRIs, due to their potential for more side-effects and higher risk of overdose.

    TCAs are broken down by the liver enzyme CYP1A2, which also metabolises caffeine. The competition between the two can slow drug breakdown, increasing side-effects, or delay caffeine clearance, making you feel jittery or wired longer than usual.

    Clozapine, an antipsychotic, is also processed by CYP1A2. One study showed that drinking two-to-three cups of coffee could increase blood levels of clozapine by up to 97%, potentially increasing risks such as drowsiness, confusion, or more serious complications.

    4. Painkillers

    Some over-the-counter painkillers, such as those containing aspirin or paracetamol, include added caffeine. Coffee can speed up how quickly these drugs are absorbed by accelerating how fast the stomach empties and making the stomach more acidic, which improves absorption for some medications such as aspirin.

    While this may help painkillers work faster, it could also raise the risk of side-effects like stomach irritation or bleeding, especially when combined with other sources of caffeine. Though no serious cases have been reported, caution is still advised.

    5. Heart medications

    Caffeine can temporarily raise blood pressure and heart rate, typically lasting three-to-four hours after consumption. For people taking blood pressure medication or drugs that control irregular heart rhythms (arrhythmias), this may counteract the intended effects of the medication.

    This doesn’t mean people with heart conditions must avoid coffee altogether – but they should monitor how it affects their symptoms, and consider limiting intake or switching to decaf if needed.

    What can you do?

    Coffee may be part of your daily routine, but it’s also a potent chemical compound that can influence how your body processes medicine. Here’s how to make sure it doesn’t interfere.

    Take levothyroxine or bisphosphonates on an empty stomach with water, and wait 30-60 minutes before drinking coffee or eating breakfast.

    Be cautious with cold and flu remedies, asthma treatments and ADHD medications, as caffeine can amplify side-effects.

    If you’re on antidepressants, antipsychotics, or blood pressure drugs, discuss your caffeine habits with your doctor.

    Consider reducing intake or choosing a decaffeinated option if you experience side-effects like restlessness, insomnia or heart palpitations.

    Everyone metabolises caffeine differently – some people feel fine after three cups, while others get side-effects after just one. Pay attention to how your body responds and talk to your pharmacist or GP if anything feels off.

    If you’re ever unsure whether your medicine and your coffee are a good match, ask your pharmacist or doctor. A short conversation might save you weeks of side-effects or reduced treatment effectiveness – and help you enjoy your brew with peace of mind.

    Dipa Kamdar, Senior Lecturer in Pharmacy Practice, Kingston University

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

  • Cillian Murphy’s Role in the ’28 Years Later’ Trilogy Is Coming Later Than We Hoped

    Cillian Murphy’s Role in the ’28 Years Later’ Trilogy Is Coming Later Than We Hoped

    Cillian Murphy is set to make his eventual return to the world of 28 Days Later within the upcoming trilogy that 28 Years Later will kick off this summer, but there are a few catches.

    Director Danny Boyle (Trainspotting) revealed vague details about the Oscar-winning Oppenheimer actor’s involvement to IGN. The upcoming trilogy expands on the world Boyle and Alex Garland (Civil War) started with 28 Days Later and its star Cillian Murphy, with a new set of interconnected stories. However, Murphy will not appear in the first film as it introduces a new central character: Spike, a 12-year-old boy portrayed by Alfie Williams whose family (led by Jodie Comer and Aaron Taylor-Johnson) finds itself in the thick of the post-apocalyptic zombie outbreak.

    “Although each story completes itself, there’s a handover section to the next film as well. So it’s very ambitious. We haven’t got the money for the third one yet. It will depend how the first one does, I guess,” Boyle shared and explained that Murphy’s return is contingent on how the first two movies do.

    “But hopefully if we do ok, they’ll give us the go-ahead for the money and for the third one. Everybody’s standing by for that, really. Including Cillian,” the director confirmed regarding Murphy’s participation.

    Currently it’s planned that he will make an appearance at the end of the Nia DaCosta (Candyman)-directed follow-up 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, which picks up on the immediate continuation of events from Boyle’s upcoming reboot sequel and is slated to open in theaters next January.

    “He is in the second one,” Boyle revealed, “I shouldn’t give away too much. I’ll get killed.” But we can guess that his appearance will only tease the potential of the third film, which Sony has yet to confirm.

    Boyle continued, “You know that thing about sequels, you want to push it on and take huge risks.”

    “I have to say fair play to [studio Sony Pictures]. They did allow us to take great liberties with [28 Years Later]. They could have said, ‘Oh no, it needs to be more sequel-y. You need to rely on some of the ideas that are in the original. And what do you mean Cillian’s not going to appear in the first one? I thought you said Cillian was going to be in it.’ We said, ‘Yeah, Cillian is going to be in it, but not quite the first one.’ So fair play to them. They’ve put up with a lot.”

    28 Years Later opens June 20.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

  • 10 Big Ideas Born in British Pubs

    10 Big Ideas Born in British Pubs

    It is often said that people should get out of their comfort zone if they want to dream up big new ideas, but maybe it all depends on where that comfort zone is. If it is one of the 45,000 or so pubs found across the British Isles, it might be better to stay put. These homey drinking establishments and social hubs have helped foster creativity in a wide range of fields. Here are ten impactful and interesting examples.

    Related: 10 Ideas That Scare People to Death

    10 Cat’s Eyes

    From 1934 onward, the world’s roads became much safer thanks to a remarkably simple invention. Called “cat’s eyes,” these are small studs in the road that gently reflect drivers’ headlights at night, illuminating the shape of the road ahead. Weather-resistant, resilient, and requiring no power, it is no surprise that they were widely adopted around the world. However, they would never have existed were it not for a trip to a Yorkshire pub one foggy night.

    The drive home from inventor Percy Shaw’s local pub was full of twists and turns. On that foggy night in 1934, Shaw narrowly avoided what could have been a fatal accident when his headlights were reflected by the eyes of a cat. After this eureka moment, he created a prototype, and by the 1960s, his company was making 2,000 cat’s eyes a day. Shaw became very rich in his lifetime, and he later had a pub named in his honor.[1]

    9 Skyscanner

    Percy Shaw is not the only person who has become rich due to a trip to his favorite watering hole. In more recent times, an Edinburgh-based entrepreneur called Gareth Williams dreamed up the flight-comparison platform Skyscanner during a brainstorming session with some friends in a pub. This took place in 2003 after Williams, a keen skier, grew frustrated with the need to check many websites to find cheap flights when he wanted to hit the slopes.

    Those two friends, Barry Smith and Bonamy Grimes, would become his co-founders. The trio started with a simple spreadsheet, which soon became a prototype website with a search engine that compared flights from different airlines.

    Later that year, the site had grown enough for the co-founders to run it full-time. Despite being some distance from Silicon Valley, Skyscanner became a true tech unicorn, being sold to a Chinese company for £1.4 billion in 2016.[2]

    8 “The Secret of Life”

    In February 1953, an excited man walked into an English pub called The Eagle and declared that he, along with a fellow named James Watson, had “found the secret of life.” Had this been announced at a drinking establishment anywhere else in the world, it probably would have been dismissed as the ravings of a madman. But in the university city of Cambridge, there might just be some truth to it. It turned out that there was.

    That man was the scientist Francis Crick. The Eagle was the pub of choice for him, Watson, and the other scientists they worked with at the nearby Cavendish Laboratory. Crick was, of course, announcing the discovery of DNA’s double-helix structure. The official announcement was made in the journal Nature, and it would later earn Crick, Watson, and their fellow scientist Maurice Wilkins a Nobel Prize in 1962.[3]

    7 Middle Earth and Narnia

    The original name of Crick and Watson’s pub was The Eagle and Child, which was also the name of a famous pub in the rival university city of Oxford. However, this pub did not achieve fame because of its patrons’ great insights into the real world but because of their ability to create new worlds. The patrons in question are J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis, two of the 20th century’s leading fantasy authors.

    The pair could often be found tucked away in a section of the pub called the “Rabbit Room.” There, they would sit by the fireplace and puff away at pipes while sharing tales of Middle-earth and Narnia, the imaginary worlds where Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings and Lewis’s Chronicles of Narnia series would be set. Other academics from the university would also attend, and the group called themselves “The Inklings.”[4]

    6 Robinson Crusoe and Treasure Island

    The Eagle and Child pub dates all the way back to 1650, just a few years before another legendary literary pub opened in the city of Bristol in west England. The Llandoger Trow opened by the city’s harbor in 1664 and was named after a nearby village in Wales and a type of boat that the landlord, Captain Hawkins, used to sail. If this sounds like a scene from Treasure Island, there might be a reason for that.

    Robert Louis Stevenson, the author of Treasure Island, is believed to have based the novel’s pub on the Llandoger Trow. It is even said that Blackbeard himself, who was born in the city, used to drink there. But the pub is also thought to have been where Daniel Defoe got the inspiration for his classic novel Robinson Crusoe. He reportedly met real-life castaway Alexander Selkirk there and modeled Crusoe on him.[5]

    5 The Gunpowder Plot

    Not all big ideas are successful, even if they are conceived in a pub. This was a lesson that Guy Fawkes and his co-conspirators found out the hard way. Still, they hold the rare distinction of having organized a spectacular failure that is celebrated every November in the UK. The now infamous Gunpowder Plot was the brainchild of a militant Catholic called Robert Catesby, who had tired of King James I’s lack of tolerance for Catholics.

    In 1604, Catesby and other Catholics gathered in a pub called the Duck and Drake. There, they swore an oath of secrecy, which was no doubt required because they were plotting to kill the king by blowing him up during a visit to the Houses of Parliament. However, somebody could not keep the secret. Following a tip-off, a plotter called Guy Fawkes was caught beneath the building with gunpowder and matches. The gang was captured and brutally executed.[6]

    4 D-Day

    Other explosive pub-based plans have been more successful than the Gunpowder Plot. One notable example was finalized at a quaint countryside pub called the Bells of Peover in the spring of 1944. That is where, over meals on two consecutive days, Allied Supreme Commander Dwight Eisenhower and U.S. General George Patton put the finishing touches to their plans for the invasion of Normandy, a crucial step in liberating Europe from Nazi tyranny.

    Patton’s troops had been based in the tiny village of Lower Peover since January of that year, and they trained for their deployment to France in the surrounding countryside. They must have trusted their leaders’ plans. One serviceman’s diary, discovered in the pub decades later, describes how the soldiers were excited for the D-Day landings on June 6. Today, the pub still flies a U.S. flag, and its dining room is known as “The Patton.”[7]

    3 A Heartbreaking Ballad

    Running a pub in modern times is much harder than it was in Patton’s day and earlier. Demographic changes, new entertainment options, and the adoption of a more health-conscious attitude among the public make pubs a tough business to be in today. However, one thing that is guaranteed to turn a pub’s fortunes around is being mentioned on a Taylor Swift album. And that is exactly what happened to a London pub called the Black Dog.

    A bonus track on Swift’s 2024 album, The Tortured Poets Department, shares its name with the pub. The lyrics narrate a story of the singer tracking a former lover there and seeing them with a younger woman. Swift has some British ex-boyfriends, namely singer Matty Healy and actor Joe Alwyn. While dating the latter, she reportedly spent a lot of time in London, allowing fans to accurately guess the pub’s location.[8]

    2 A Famous Cinematic Pub

    Few pubs or bars in films have been as central to the plot as The Winchester in 2004’s Shaun of the Dead. It is where the unusual romantic comedy opens, with Simon Pegg’s Shaun being begged by his girlfriend not to spend every night there. When the zombie apocalypse strikes, Shaun’s plan is to save his loved ones and seek safety inside the pub, mirroring Pegg’s real-life zombie survival plan.

    As young actors living in London, Pegg and his co-star Nick Frost would spend their free time in their local pub, The Shepherds. While there, they discussed plans for surviving a zombie apocalypse, with Pegg choosing the pub as his destination to hold out against the hordes. Their friend, the director Edgar Wright, turned the plan into the plot of the film and based The Winchester on The Shepherds, even giving the pub’s staff the same names.[9]

    1 An Important Statistical Distribution

    This last idea was actually conceived in a brewery, not a pub. However, the goal was to improve the drinks served in the latter. It just turned out to have a lot of applications besides that. The brewery is also no longer British, although it would have been at the time. The idea in question is William Sealy Gosset’s t-distribution, an important statistical tool that Gosset developed in 1908 while working at the Guinness brewery in Dublin.

    Gosset’s inspiration came from another scientist who thought hops with more resin made better beer. However, they could not measure the resin of all the hops in a crop. They could only test small samples and had to make an educated guess about whether the whole crop had high or low resin or if only the ones they had picked out did. Gosset’s t-distribution brought rigor to this process and can be applied to many tests with small samples.[10]

  • AI slop is way more common than you think. Here’s what we know

    AI slop is way more common than you think. Here’s what we know

    This kind of “AI slop” is becoming increasingly common — so much so that people are using it as a form of dialogue. But AI slop doesn’t only refer to images.

    In May 2025, a post asking “[Am I the asshole] for telling my husband’s affair partner’s fiancé about their relationship?” quickly received 6,200 upvotes and more than 900 comments on Reddit. This popularity earned the post a spot on Reddit’s front page of trending posts. The problem? It was (very likely) written by artificial intelligence (AI).

    The post contained some telltale signs of AI, such as using stock phrases (“[my husband’s] family is furious”) and excessive quotation marks, and sketching an unrealistic scenario designed to generate outrage rather than reflect a genuine dilemma.

    While this post has since been removed by the forum’s moderators, Reddit users have repeatedly expressed their frustration with the proliferation of this kind of content.

    High-engagement, AI-generated posts on Reddit are an example of what is known as “AI slop” – cheap, low-quality AI-generated content, created and shared by anyone from low-level influencers to coordinated political influence operations.

    Estimates suggest that over half of longer English-language posts on LinkedIn are written by AI. In response to that report, Adam Walkiewicz, a director of product at LinkedIn, told Wired it has “robust defenses in place to proactively identify low-quality and exact or near-exact duplicate content. When we detect such content, we take action to ensure it is not broadly promoted.”

    But AI-generated low-quality news sites are popping up all over the place, and AI images are also flooding social media platforms such as Facebook. You may have come across images like “shrimp Jesus” in your own feeds.

    It costs almost nothing to make

    AI-generated content is cheap. A report by the Nato StratCom Center of Excellence from 2023 found that for a mere €10 (about £8), you can buy tens of thousands of fake views and likes, and hundreds of AI-generated comments, on almost all major social media platforms.

    While much of it is seemingly innocent entertainment, one study from 2024 found that about a quarter of all internet traffic is made up of “bad bots”. These bots, which seek to spread disinformation, scalp event tickets or steal personal data, are also becoming much better at masking as humans.

    In short, the world is dealing with the “enshittification” of the web: online services have become gradually worse over time as tech companies prioritise profits over user experience. AI-generated content is just one aspect of this.

    From Reddit posts that enrage readers to tearjerking cat videos, this content is extremely attention-grabbing and thus lucrative for both slop-creators and platforms.

    This is known as engagement bait – a tactic to get people to like, comment and share, regardless of the quality of the post. And you don’t need to seek out the content to be exposed to it.

    AI-generated images like this one are designed to get as much engagement (likes, comments and shares) as possible. Microsoft Copilot, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

    One study explored how engagement bait, such as images of cute babies wrapped in cabbage, is recommended to social media users even when they do not follow any AI-slop pages or accounts. These pages, which often link to low-quality sources and promote real or made-up products, may be designed to boost their follower base in order to sell the account later for profit.

    Meta (Facebook’s parent company) said in April that it is cracking down on “spammy” content that tries to “game the Facebook algorithm to increase views”, but did not specify AI-generated content. Meta has used its own AI-generated profiles on Facebook, but has since removed some of these accounts.

    What the risks are

    This may all have serious consequences for democracy and political communication. AI can cheaply and efficiently create misinformation about elections that is indiscernible from human-generated content. Ahead of the 2024 US presidential elections, researchers identified a large influence campaign designed to advocate for Republican issues and attack political adversaries.

    And before you think it’s only Republicans doing it, think again: these bots are as biased as humans of all perspectives. A report by Rutgers University found that Americans on all sides of the political spectrum rely on bots to promote their preferred candidates.

    Researchers aren’t innocent either: scientists at the University of Zurich were recently caught using AI-powered bots to post on Reddit as part of a research project on whether inauthentic comments can change people’s minds. But they failed to disclose that these comments were fake to Reddit moderators.

    Reddit is now considering taking legal action against the university. The company’s chief legal officer said: “What this University of Zurich team did is deeply wrong on both a moral and legal level.”

    Political operatives, including from authoritarian countries such as Russia, China and Iran, invest considerable sums in AI-driven operations to influence elections around the democratic world.

    How effective these operations are is up for debate. One study found that Russia’s attempts to interfere in the 2016 US elections through social media were a dud, while another found it predicted polling figures for Trump. Regardless, these campaigns are becoming much more sophisticated and well-organised.

    And even seemingly apolitical AI-generated content can have consequences. The sheer volume of it makes accessing real news and human-generated content difficult.

    What’s to be done?

    Malign AI content is proving to be extremely hard to spot by humans and computers alike. Computer scientists recently identified a bot network of about 1,100 fake X accounts posting machine-generated content (mostly about cryptocurrency) and interacting with each other through likes and retweets. Problematically, the Botometer (a tool they developed to detect bots) failed to identify these accounts as fake.

    The use of AI is relatively easy to spot if you know what to look for, particularly when content is formulaic or unapologetically fake. But it’s much harder when it comes to short-form content (for example, Instagram comments) or high-quality fake images. And the technology used to create AI slop is quickly improving.

    As close observers of AI trends and the spread of misinformation, we would love to end on a positive note and offer practical remedies to spot AI slop or reduce its potency. But in reality, many people are simply jumping ship.

    Dissatisfied with the amount of AI slop, social media users are escaping traditional platforms and joining invite-only online communities. This may lead to further fracturing of our public sphere and exacerbate polarisation, as the communities we seek out are often comprised of like-minded individuals.

    As this sorting intensifies, social media risks devolving into mindless entertainment, produced and consumed mostly by bots who interact with other bots while us humans spectate. Of course, platforms don’t want to lose users, but they might push as much AI slop as the public can tolerate.

    Some potential technical solutions include labelling AI-generated content through improved bot detection and disclosure regulation, although it’s unclear how well warnings like these work in practice.

    Some research also shows promise in helping people to better identify deepfakes, but research is in its early stages.

    Overall, we are just starting to realise the scale of the problem. Soberingly, if humans drown in AI slop, so does AI: AI models trained on the “enshittified” internet are likely to produce garbage.


    Jon Roozenbeek, Lecturer in Psychology, University of Cambridge; Sander van der Linden, Professor of Social Psychology in Society, University of Cambridge, and Yara Kyrychenko, PhD Candidate, Cambridge Social Decision-Making Lab, University of Cambridge

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

  • 10 Times the Christian Church Took on the Animal Kingdom

    10 Times the Christian Church Took on the Animal Kingdom

    Christianity has had a choppy relationship with the animal kingdom over the years, from the sacrifices of the Old Testament to the generally favorable status animals enjoy in the modern Christian mindset. Along the way, the Christian Church has had a particularly tough time deciding where it stands, caught between respecting God’s creations on the one hand and preventing their wanton destructiveness on the other.

    As a result, from the fall of the Roman Empire to the end of the Enlightenment, Church authorities have wound up persecuting, trying, exorcising, punishing, and otherwise taking on animals of every shape and size—often without much success. And that’s not counting sources of myth or legend—because Saint Patrick did not, in fact, drive the snakes out of Ireland!

    Here are ten historical cases of the Christian Church going toe-to-toe with animals.

    Related: 10 Slithery Surprises about Snake-Handling Churches

    10 Archbishop of Trier Anathematized Swallows, 977–993

    The Early Middle Ages aren’t known as the Dark Ages for nothing, as the fall of the Roman Empire had major repercussions for the intellectual and cultural development of Europe, paving the way for some pretty archaic (by both pre–Middle Ages and modern standards) practices to creep in. Following the dissolution of the Empire, Europe metastasized into a church-state of Christendom, where Catholicism reigned supreme, and superstition and barbarism were the orders of the day.

    Figures like Egbert (950–993) moved from the nobility into the Church and helped control the masses through this new authority. After training in Egmond Abbey (founded by his own family), Egbert became the Archbishop of Trier in 977—but just because he had the authority didn’t mean he was right.

    Egbert sought divine intervention, regularly disturbed by swallows, who chirped and tweeted through his services and defiled his vestments at the Trier Cathedral altar. Rather than contact a bird-handler, he anathematized the swallows, forbidding them to enter the cathedral on pain of death. And it’s said the superstition still holds in Trier that if a swallow flies into the cathedral, it will drop dead.[1]

    9 Saint Bernard Excommunicated Flies, 1124

    Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153), venerated as Saint Bernard, was the Christian abbot who co-founded the Knights Templar at a time when religious mysticism and militancy were potent and the Crusades were in full swing.

    Despite his exalted position within the Church and his influence as a scion of the French high nobility, Saint Bernard wasn’t always occupied by founding abbeys, going on political maneuvers to influence the papacy, or advocating for holy crusades. No, sometimes he was concerned with everyday pests.

    In 1124, Saint Bernard was called upon to deal with a swarm of flies irritating worshippers and the officiating priests in the abbey church of Foigny. Drawing on his mystic connection to God, Bernard cursed and excommunicated the flies. Accounts differ on what happened next, with some claiming the flies fell to the floor dead right there and others merely that the flies were gone by the following day. Either way, supernatural maledictions against animals were considered a win-win for the Church: if the pest departed, the anathema had worked, and if they didn’t, then the failure could be attributed to the sins of the congregation.[2]

    8 Pope Gregory Demonized Black Cats, 1233

    The 13th century was a time of heightened superstition in Europe and saw the Church demonizing heretics left, right, and center, linking their lack of belief in Catholicism to the devil. Pope Gregory IX (1145–1241) was a product of these times and led the Catholic Church from 1227, having spent the bulk of his life ascending through the Church’s pillars of power in Rome.

    Despite being so wedded to Christian ideology as to ascend to the papacy, Pope Gregory’s love of God’s lands and gifts was not universal. He wasn’t a big fan of black cats.

    In 1233, he issued the Vox in Rama papal bull, which condemned the heresy of Luciferianism that was reportedly spreading through Germany, demonized heretics, and designated black cats as an embodiment of Satan. Accounts differ on the results of this edict, as some historians go as far as to claim that this led to the orchestrated extermination of cats by the Inquisition for centuries, contributing to the spread of the plague. What’s for certain is our historically maligned, black-furred friends didn’t fare well.[3]

    7 Sainte Geneviève Monks Burned a Child-Eating Pig, 1266

    Despite witchcraft, mysticism, and heresy being popular topics in Medieval Europe, it was nonetheless usually illegal to execute anyone—man, child, or beast—without a trial. This meant pretty much everyone and everything would face a court, more often than not organized and administrated by the Church, which, as the arbiter of morality, played a central role in maintaining and meting out law and order.

    If found guilty of a capital crime, humans, dogs, cows, pigs, horses, bulls, corpses, and even inanimate objects were sent to the stake or to the gallows, with the animals sometimes dressed in human clothes.

    In 1266, at Fontenay-aux-Roses, a commune in the southwestern suburbs of Paris, France, a pig was captured after attacking and eating a small child. Tried, convicted, and sentenced to death, the hog was publicly burned by the monks of Sainte Geneviève. This holds the record for the first officially documented animal execution.[4]

    6 Basel Tried a Rooster, 1474

    Even in the dying days of the Middle Ages, as Europe headed rapidly into the Renaissance, certain members of the Church still had it in for the animal kingdom. Switzerland was under Catholic rule and Catholic law in the 15th century. It was seized by the same supernatural hysteria that fueled the Inquisition.

    Though overseen or conducted by the Church, trials of animals did not often include the accusation of demonic possession or witchcraft—charges usually reserved for wicked humans, or at least those perceived as such. Nonetheless, in 1474 Basel (Bâle), the trial of a rooster (or cock) was a notable exception.

    The male bird was charged with laying an egg, and in the eyes of the Church, rooster eggs were the product and tool of witchcraft—and an age-old belief suggested that the egg, if not destroyed, would become either a basilisk (giant snake) or a cockatrice (two-legged dragon). It was successfully argued that this was a case of Satan having entered the rooster, and the bird was publicly burned at the stake.[5]

    5 Bishop of Lausanne Anathematized Beetles, 1478–9

    Elsewhere in Switzerland, things weren’t a whole lot more sensible. In Lausanne, a species of bruchus (a type of beetle) was destroying local crops, so the bishop of the time—Benoît de Montferrand (ca. 1446–1491)—stepped in.

    The bishop conducted a trial against the bruchus, where evidence of their destruction and the suffering they had caused from local clergy was heard. After a conference with the bishop, it was decided that they would be anathematized. A mandate was issued urging the citizens of Lausanne to pray and commanding the insects to depart from the fields within six days.

    But these measures didn’t stick, as a continuation of this case against the bruchus—or possibly a new one—was conducted in 1479. The insects continued doing more damage than ever, and a further trial was conducted, with the court banning and exorcising the insects. As this again had no effect, the Church blamed the sins of the citizens, claiming God had permitted the insect to remain as punishment until they repented their wickedness and gave evidence of their love to Him by presenting allocations of their remaining crops to the Church.[6]

    4 Cardinal Bishop of Autun Cursed the Slugs, 1487

    The commune of Autun in central France saw a lot of action taken against animals in the 15th century—but most of it was fruitless. In 1487, having been informed that slugs were eating the crops and devastating several estates across different parts of his diocese, the sitting cardinal bishop of Autun ordered public processions for three days in each parish, enjoining upon the slugs to leave the estates under penalty of being accursed.

    In this, as in similar cases from the same time, the clergy members from the area were charged with leading these processions and ensuring that, if the slugs did not depart, they would be excommunicated and smitten with anathema.

    The slugs were warned three times to stop consuming the vital herbs of the fields and grape vines, but whether this actually had any effect was not recorded. Unless the slugs were present at the parishes themselves and capable of understanding French, it’s difficult to see how they would have received the message.[7]

    3 Autun Ecclesiastical Court vs. Rats, 1522

    But Autun wasn’t finished with the kingdom of fauna yet. In 1522, rats had plundered the barley crops of Burgundy—the province in which Autun sits—eating their way through an entire harvest and angering the peasants who now found themselves in dire hardship.

    With a potential uprising on their hands and the whole region facing famine, riots, and disorder, the clerics felt something had to be done—and fast. Thus, the rats were put on trial by an ecclesiastical court (a tribunal established by religious authorities) in Autun.

    The rats were represented by attorney Bartholomew Chassenée (1480–1541; “Barthélemy de Chasseneuz” in other records), who made his name defending this case. When the rats themselves did not appear before the court, Chassenée argued that his clients could not be expected to obey their summons because their mortal enemies—cats—were preventing them from attending safely. As such, Chassenée claimed, they had the right to disobey the summons and mitigate the sentence of the judge—a defense that earned him fame throughout the country, launched his high-profile legal career, and saw him undertake several other similar cases in his lifetime.[8]

    2 St. Julien Trial and Proclamation Against Weevils, 1545–6

    The destruction of crops and precious resources by pests has been a common problem for most of human history, with only industrialization and the development of chemical deterrents creating any serious defense against them.

    However, in the early modern period in southeastern France, there were certainly no pesticides to turn to when the insects came calling. In 1545, vineyard owners in St. Julien found their precious grape vines in peril from the ravages of the Rhynchites auratus, a common form of weevil. The creatures had infested their crops, so the winemakers brought a complaint and trial against them.

    The sentence itself was delayed, but the Church issued a proclamation the following year, instructing public prayers and Mass to be celebrated on three days while the Host was borne in procession around the vineyards, all to appease the divine wrath that the weevils were seemingly evidence of. And, for once, it worked: the insects disappeared, not returning to the vineyards for forty-one years (at which point they were tried again).[9]

    1 Franciscan Monastery Sued Termites, 1713

    By the 1700s, Europe was in the Age of Enlightenment, enjoying the kind of social, intellectual, and philosophical progress the preceding thousand years could only have dreamt of. Christianity was still the dominant religion, although science and philosophy were challenging many of the superstitions and supernatural elements of the religion previously taken as rote. On the other side of the world, however, old habits died hard.

    In 1713, the friars of a Franciscan monastery in Piedade no Maranhão, Brazil, were locked in conflict with termites. The creatures were not just eating and spoiling the monastery’s food supplies but also gnawing through furniture and the building itself.

    The friars filed a complaint with the bishop, and the insects were sued by an ecclesiastical tribunal. Naturally, the termites were appointed a lawyer, who argued that they were God’s own creatures and, therefore, had the right to eat, putting the Church in a bind. The final decision resulted in a compromise: the friars were instructed to provide a dedicated habitat for the insects, and the termites were commanded to remain at this site lest they be excommunicated.[10]

  • Veterans Show Lower Rates of Depression Than Civilians in Surprising Study

    Veterans Show Lower Rates of Depression Than Civilians in Surprising Study

    An extensive survey study found that veterans could have fewer depression symptoms than civilians. (Credit: WikiMedia Commons)

    Serving in the U.S. Armed Forces could offer a mental-health advantage, according to a federal survey reviewed in BMJ Military Health. Researchers looked at National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data collected between 2011 and 2023. They found that adults who once served on active duty were about 23% less likely to show signs of moderate-to-severe depression than people who never served.

    This flips prior understandings that veterans actually were at higher risk for depression.

    “Previous research has indicated that the incidence of depressive symptoms among veterans is nearly double that of the general population; however, these studies often involve samples drawn from healthcare systems, which may not accurately represent the broader community,” the authors countered.

    What the study measured

    NHANES combines interviews and medical exams from a nationally representative sample. The research team analyzed records for 25,949 adults. Among them, 2,407 were veterans and 23,542 were civilians. Depression was gauged with the nine-question PHQ-9 screen; scores of 10 or above signal a possible clinical problem. Roughly 9.5% of all adults hit that mark, compared with 7.5% of veterans.

    To rule out other explanations, the investigators adjusted for eight factors that often influence mood: age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status, education, income, blood pressure, cholesterol and diabetes. Even after those adjustments, the link between military service and lower depression risk remained.

    Of the 2,407 veterans, 213 screened positive for depression. Women faced the highest odds, more than triple those of men. Veterans who were divorced or widowed also had greater risk, while those with higher incomes or normal blood pressure fared better. Whether a veteran had deployed overseas did not, by itself, change the likelihood of depression once the other factors were considered.

    “While the prevalence of depression is notably high among both active-duty personnel and veterans, this large-sample cross sectional study does not support the conclusion that military service increases the risk of depression,” the authors said.

    Why service might help

    Military life brings stress—long separations, intense training, the possibility of combat—but it can also build resilience. Strong unit bonds, clear goals and coping skills learned during service may continue to protect many veterans after they return to civilian life. The authors note that this balance appears to tip toward protection, at least when depression is measured using a brief survey across a broad segment of the population.

    NHANES records each person only once, so the study can’t prove that serving in the armed forces prevents later depression. The survey also lacks details on combat, job roles and traumatic events. Because depression is self-reported, some people may choose not to disclose symptoms.

    The findings challenge the idea that military service necessarily harms long-term mental health. Most veterans appear to do as well as, or better than, civilians on this measure, though women and veterans dealing with relationship loss remain at higher risk. The research team suggests following recruits over time to see how combat exposure, health history and social support shape mood throughout and after a military career.

    “The NHANES database used in this study provides a representative sample of the US population, confirming that military service may, in fact, serve as a protective factor against depression after adjusting for sociodemographic variables,” the authors conclude.

  • NASA Satellites Capture ‘River Tsunamis’ Surging Hundreds of Miles Inland

    NASA Satellites Capture ‘River Tsunamis’ Surging Hundreds of Miles Inland

    Giant ocean waves engulfing tiny boats are the stuff of nightmares—but it turns out rivers also form flood waves that are nothing to sneeze at.

    That’s according to researchers from Virginia Tech and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), who measured three large flood waves, also called flow waves, in U.S. rivers via satellite data. They claim their approach is the first of its kind, and could inform flood mitigation and warning efforts.

    While tides and wind drive ocean waves, intense rain or snowmelt can trigger river waves, which consist of water surges that can span hundreds of miles. River waves are crucial to the movement of nutrients and organisms, but can also be dangerous.

    “Analyzing flow wave dynamics to answer questions such as, ‘How high could water levels rise during a flow wave?’ and ‘How fast do flow waves travel?’ has important implications for human safety, infrastructure design and management, and fluvial ecology,” the researchers wrote in a study published May 14 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

    The team investigated this phenomenon in data from NASA and the French space agency CNES’ Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite. SWOT can detect the height of almost all bodies of water on Earth’s surface by shooting microwaves at the water and measuring the time it takes for them to bounce back. “In addition to monitoring total storage of waters in lakes and rivers, we zoom in on dynamics and impacts of water movement and change,” Nadya Vinogradova Shiffer, a SWOT program scientist who did not participate in the study, said in a NASA statement.

    Lead author Hana Thurman, a researcher in the Department of Geosciences at Virginia Tech, found three obvious examples of river waves within the SWOT data. One occurred in Montana’s Yellowstone River in April 2023, when a 9.1-foot-tall (2.8-meter-tall) crest suddenly rose and sped toward North Dakota’s Missouri River. The wave’s peak stretched across 6.8 miles (11 kilometers), and was likely the result of a collapsed ice jam farther up the river.

    “We’re learning more about the shape and speed of flow waves, and how they change along long stretches of river,” Thurman explained.

    A second and significantly more dramatic river wave took place in January 2024 in the Colorado River in Texas. It was 30 feet (9 m) tall, spanned 166 miles (267 km), and moved at around 3.5 feet (1.07 m) per second for over 250 miles (400 km). The third river Thurman analyzed via SWOT data formed in Georgia’s Ocmulgee River two months later: 20 feet (6 m) tall, stretching across over 100 miles (165 km), and traveling at around a foot (0.33 m) per second for more than 124 miles (200 km). Rainfall likely caused both these cases.

    While experts can measure river waves with stream gauges, they are sparsely distributed. As such, “satellite data is complementary because it can help fill in the gaps,” said George Allen, a Virginia Tech hydrologist and co-author of the study. The NASA statement likened stream gauges to highway toll booths—providing measurements at fixed points—while SWOT is more like a traffic helicopter taking aerial photographs as it passes by.

    Needless to say, such space-based observations can bolster flood detection and warning systems. “If we see something in the data, we can say something,”  Cedric David, a hydrologist at the JPL, concluded. “For a long time, we’ve stood on the banks of our rivers, but we’ve never seen them like we are now.”

  • 10 Things That Will Make You Rethink Everything Normal

    10 Things That Will Make You Rethink Everything Normal

    We like to think we’ve got a grip on reality. That the world mostly makes sense, and the things we were taught in school are—more or less—true. But scratch just beneath the surface, and things get ‘weird’ fast.

    This isn’t your average trivia list. These are the cracks in the matrix, the “wait, what?” facts that feel more like glitches than knowledge. Hidden truths, subtle illusions, and bizarre phenomena suggest we might only see a sliver of what’s actually going on.

    Here are 10 things that might just melt your brain a little—in the best way.

    Related: 10 Mind-Blowing Examples of the Placebo Effect

    10 College Might Be Making You Less Curious

    The structure of higher education often rewards regurgitation over exploration. Students learn to ace tests, not to question assumptions. Curiosity—the engine of real learning—gets quietly smothered under syllabi and Scantrons.

    Ironically, the place designed to expand your mind might be quietly narrowing it. College often turns to learn into a performance: grades over growth, memorization over exploration. You start chasing GPA points instead of ideas.

    Students are rewarded for staying within the lines—following rubrics, citing the “right” sources, and answering questions that already have answers. Stray too far off the syllabus, and suddenly you’re “off-topic.” Curiosity becomes a risk, not a virtue.

    By the time you graduate, you may have mastered APA formatting but forgotten how to wonder.[1]

    9 Octopuses Are Basically Aliens

    Not metaphorically—literally. Their RNA editing abilities are so bizarre that some scientists seriously explore the idea that their ancestors came from space via panspermia. Also, they have nine brains. What even is that?

    Octopuses aren’t just weird—they’re fundamentally other. They have three hearts, blue blood, and the ability to change color and texture like a living mood ring. Their arms can taste and think independently, and two-thirds of their neurons aren’t in their brain—they’re in their limbs. Each arm is like a semi-autonomous creature attached to a central hub.

    Even stranger? Octopuses are masters of camouflage despite being colorblind. They somehow process visual information through their skin, and we still don’t fully understand how.

    Then there’s the genetic weirdness: octopuses can edit their own RNA on the fly, essentially rewriting their biological instructions in real time. This is incredibly rare in animals. What are the only other known life forms with this skill? Viruses.

    Some scientists have even (controversially) suggested that octopus DNA is so radically different from anything else on Earth that it might point to an extraterrestrial origin—like their ancestors hitched a ride here on a comet.

    Are they aliens? Probably not. But are they alien enough to make us question what intelligence even is? Absolutely.[2]

    8 The Earth Breathes

    There’s something called the “Chandler wobble”—a real, observed wobble in Earth’s rotation. Combined with atmospheric pressure and oceanic movement, it causes the Earth’s surface to shift, like it’s subtly breathing.

    It sounds like a myth, but it’s science: the Earth doesn’t just spin—it wobbles, shifts, and subtly inhales.

    In the Chandler wobble, the Earth’s axis drifts in a slow, looping circle. It’s not dramatic—just a few meters over a year—but it’s enough to slightly change your GPS coordinates without you ever moving. Scientists still aren’t entirely sure why it happens.

    Then there’s the seasonal “breath” of the planet. During spring and summer in the Northern Hemisphere, vast forests pull carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere—like a giant inhale. In fall and winter, when those trees shed their leaves and decay, they release carbon back—an exhale.

    Even the solid ground beneath us isn’t still. Under extreme conditions—like earthquakes, glacier movements, or even the shifting weight of water reservoirs—the Earth can actually “ring” like a bell. It’s called a free oscillation, and we’ve recorded it.

    Put it all together, and our planet stops feeling like a rock—and starts feeling like something much more alive.[3]

    7 Most of History Is a Guess

    We act like history is a solid timeline—but in truth, much of what we “know” is based on best guesses, biased records, or literally one guy’s account. Entire centuries have gone “missing” in historical records—the “Phantom Time Hypothesis.”

    We like to imagine history as a clean timeline—a neat stack of facts laid out by smart people in museums and textbooks. But the truth? Much of it is stitched together from fragments, myths, and wild speculation.

    Entire civilizations vanished without a trace. Languages died with no record. Key events are known from a single source—often written decades or centuries later by someone with an agenda. Think about it: what we know of Socrates comes from his student Plato. Imagine if everything about your life was written down by just one of your friends.

    Even the dates are shaky. The Phantom Time Hypothesis—a fringe but fascinating theory—suggests that nearly 300 years of history (between AD 614 and 911) were completely fabricated by medieval scribes to make a ruler’s reign seem more legitimate. Mainstream historians reject it, but the fact that it’s even plausible shows how fragile the scaffolding of “truth” really is.

    And don’t forget the historical filter: wars, fires, colonization, censorship—so much has been lost or destroyed. What survives often says more about power than about people. In the end, history isn’t a record—it’s a story we’re still rewriting, one incomplete clue at a time.[4]

    6 Your Mind Makes Up Most of Your Vision

    Only a tiny fraction of your visual field is actually in high resolution. Your brain guesses the rest. You’re mostly seeing a hallucination stitched together from memory and assumption.

    You’re not seeing the world so much as your brain is guessing it. Only the very center of your visual field—about the size of your thumb at arm’s length—is in sharp focus. The rest? Blurry, low-res input that your brain smooths over with assumptions, memory, and context.

    Even stranger: your eyes have a literal blind spot where the optic nerve connects to the retina. There are no photoreceptors there at all. But you never notice it because your brain just fills it in with what it thinks should be there—like Photoshop’s content-aware fill, but in real time.

    What you’re “seeing” is less like a live feed and more like a predictive simulation. Your brain uses prior knowledge, expectation, and peripheral data to construct a stable visual world that often doesn’t match what’s actually out there.

    This is why optical illusions work. It’s why eyewitness testimony is so unreliable. And it’s why you can stare at something and not see it—because your brain already decided it wasn’t important. Reality, as far as your brain is concerned, is mostly a really convincing hallucination.[5]

    5 Time Moves Faster in Your Head as You Age

    Ever wonder why time flies faster as you get older? It’s not just perception—neural transmission and dopamine production both slow down, altering how your brain experiences time.

    Remember how endless summers felt as a kid? How a week could feel like a lifetime? That wasn’t just nostalgia—it was neuroscience.

    As we age, our perception of time changes dramatically. One theory is that time feels slower when we’re young because everything is new. Novel experiences flood the brain with data, forcing it to process more information, which in turn stretches the sense of time. A single afternoon exploring the woods at age 8 holds as much sensory density as a whole week of routine adulthood.

    But there’s also a biological reason: our brains literally slow down. As we age, the rate at which our neurons fire and transmit information decreases. This affects how many “snapshots” of the world our brain can take in per second. Fewer mental snapshots = faster-feeling time.

    There’s even research showing that dopamine, which helps regulate time perception, declines as we get older. The clock doesn’t actually tick faster—but the way we experience it compresses. This is why years start to blur. Why December sneaks up on you. Why time doesn’t just fly—it evaporates.[6]

    4 Plants Know When They’re Being Eaten

    Plants can “hear” themselves being chewed on and respond with chemical defenses. Some even send chemical warnings to neighboring plants. The idea that plants are passive is just wrong.

    They don’t scream (audibly), they don’t run—but make no mistake: plants are far from passive. In fact, they’re shockingly aware of what’s happening to them.

    Studies have shown that when a caterpillar starts munching on a leaf, the plant can hear the vibrations of chewing and respond almost immediately by producing defensive chemicals—essentially making itself taste terrible or even toxic. Some release airborne signals that alert nearby plants, preemptively activating their defenses. It’s like a silent neighborhood watch for leaves.

    Certain plants even produce specific compounds tailored to the attacker—an insect vs. a fungus triggers different responses, meaning the plant can identify what’s hurting it. Some can send signals down to their roots and across their entire system to warn other parts of themselves: “We’re under attack.”

    And it gets weirder. Some studies suggest plants can even learn from repeated stimuli. They’re not just reacting—they’re remembering. They don’t have brains. They don’t have nerves. But they have something we’re only just beginning to understand: a distributed, chemical intelligence that blurs the line between plant and animal.

    So next time you’re trimming your houseplant, just know—it might know you’re doing it.[7]

    3 You’ve Never Truly Seen a Mirror Image of Yourself

    The “mirror you” is a flipped version that no one else ever sees. Photos aren’t it either—those are flat and distorted. Your actual face is something you’ve never seen with your own eyes. That reflection you stare at every day? It’s not really you.

    It’s a flipped version of you that only exists in the mirror. When you look in a mirror, your left side becomes the right side, and vice versa. So, while you may think you’re gazing at yourself, what you see is a reversed, distorted version that doesn’t match how others perceive you.

    Even photographs aren’t quite you—they’re two-dimensional, capturing your image in a moment, but they flatten everything and don’t account for the subtle, ever-shifting depth of your actual face.

    It gets even weirder. When you look in the mirror, you see a face you’re not used to. Most people have a stronger emotional connection to the flipped version, the one they’ve been seeing in photos, as opposed to the actual version others see. This creates a dissonance when people encounter their “real” face in candid shots—they’re often surprised by how they look, even though it’s objectively their face.

    What’s even more unsettling? You’ve never truly seen yourself from someone else’s perspective. You can’t. The closest you’ll ever get is a picture, which is still warped by angles and lighting. Your face, in its true, unfiltered form, exists only in the minds of others—and it’s a version you’ve never experienced firsthand.[8]

    2 Airplanes Are Literally Designed to Flex

    The wings of a Boeing 787 can bend more than 26 feet (7.9 meters). Engineers design them this way intentionally—rigid wings would snap under stress. You’re flying in a giant, engineered bird that flaps just a little.

    Next time you board a plane, think about this: The wings are designed to bend. A lot. In fact, the wings of a Boeing 787 can flex upward roughly the length of a bus before the structure begins to strain. This isn’t a flaw or an afterthought. It’s by design.

    Airplanes fly at altitudes where air pressure is incredibly low, and turbulence is often unavoidable. The wings, made from advanced composite materials, are engineered to absorb and respond to the stresses of flight—bending with the winds rather than snapping. Without this flexing, the forces acting on the plane—especially during high winds or turbulence—could cause severe structural damage. Instead, the wings act like shock absorbers, maintaining stability and strength.

    Engineers test this flexibility by subjecting wings to extreme conditions, bending them to their limits to ensure they’ll hold up during normal flight. They can be bent so far that it’s almost impossible to imagine how they’ll snap back into shape. But they do. Time and time again.

    This design doesn’t just improve safety—it enhances efficiency. A flexible wing means less drag and more streamlined movement through the air, saving fuel and improving the aircraft’s overall performance.

    So, the next time you’re soaring through the sky, know that the wings you’re trusting are bending, flexing, and moving with the air instead of just cutting through it rigidly. The technology is an elegant marriage of physics, materials science, and engineering—literally built to bend without breaking.[9]

    1 We’ve Mapped More of Mars Than Earth’s Oceans

    Over 80% of Earth’s oceans are completely unmapped and unexplored. We know more about the surface of the Moon than we do about the terrain beneath our own feet.

    We know more about the dusty, red surface of Mars than we do about the vast, hidden depths of our own oceans. It’s hard to wrap your head around, but the fact is that we’ve mapped only about 20% of Earth’s ocean floors in detail, while NASA has mapped nearly the entire surface of Mars.

    Why the imbalance? Earth’s oceans are difficult to explore. They’re dark, cold, and under extreme pressure, making it hard to send robots or cameras deep enough to get a complete picture. The vast majority of our ocean floor remains a mystery—vast stretches of the seafloor are only studied from afar through sonar and satellite technology, and much of it remains unseen.

    Mars, on the other hand, is much more accessible to our technology. The planet’s surface is visible through telescopes and has been extensively photographed by satellites and rovers. Despite its extreme conditions—no breathable atmosphere, extreme temperatures, and harsh radiation—Mars is a “static” surface, relatively simple to study from a distance.

    Our oceans, however, are in constant flux, with currents, tides, and underwater volcanoes reshaping the landscape. In addition to that, the depths—some parts of the ocean are nearly 7 miles (11.3 km) deep—make it clear why mapping the ocean floor is far more complex.

    But here’s the kicker: The ocean is a vast, untapped resource, home to countless species, undiscovered ecosystems, and valuable minerals. It could hold the key to understanding climate change, advancing medicine, or even providing new energy sources.

    The fact that we’ve spent far more time mapping an alien planet than exploring our own planet’s underworld is a striking reminder of just how much there is still to discover—right beneath the surface of our own home.[10]